The Impact of Modern Crisis Management Strategies on Crisis Management Planning
Amany Saflo1, Mostafa Aldarwish2, Hussam Khadija3
1Amany Saflow, Ph.D. Candidate, Faculty of Business Administration – Idlib University, Syria.
2Dr. Mostafa Aldarwish, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Administrative Sciences, Idlib University, Syria.
3Dr. Hussam Khadija, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Administrative Sciences, Idlib University, Syria.
Manuscript received on 30 January 2023 | Revised Manuscript received on 11 March 2023 | Manuscript Accepted on 15 March 2023 | Manuscript published on 30 March 2023 | PP: 12-21 | Volume-9 Issue-7, March 2023 | Retrieval Number: 100.1/ijmh.F1578029623 | DOI: 10.35940/ijmh.F1578.039723
Open Access | Editorial and Publishing Policies | Cite | Mendeley | Indexing and Abstracting
© The Authors. Published By: Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP). This is an open access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Abstract: The research aims to identify modern strategies for crisis management and their impact on planning for crisis management, applying the research to employees in the directorates of the university presidency and its offices, totalling 75 employees. The researcher employed a descriptive approach, and a questionnaire comprising 28 items was prepared. It included two approaches (modern strategies for crisis management and crisis management planning). A questionnaire was distributed electronically to a research sample of 60 employees, selected from the Krejci and Morgan table. The researcher found a statistically significant effect of modern crisis management strategies on crisis management planning, at a significance level of 5%. The most modern used strategies were the Crisis Fragmentation strategy, followed by the Changing Path strategy, then the Containing the Crisis strategy, then the Crisis Exhaustion strategy, followed by the Work Teams strategy, and finally the Mobilisation Reserve strategy in the last phase. The research concluded there are no statistically significant differences in modern strategies for crisis management according to the variable (gender, educational qualification, respondent’s character, age), at the level of significance of 5%. The researcher recommended the need to form task forces to manage crises in colleges, utilising expertise and providing the necessary material and human support.
Keywords: Crisis Management, Modern Strategies for Crisis Management – Crisis Management Planning.
Scope of the Article: Crisis Management